Comments on: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Theaters)

By: bert671

bert671 — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:52:40 +0000

this movie was fuggin dumb! but i loved the explosions and i love that the robots have balls now. oh stop crying you transformers purists babies.

stop crying foul about thems two robots with bad grammatics. they are meant for the dumb high school crowd. you know the kind that can’t spell or write simple sentences and will be graduating from high school by social promotions.

and how bout that megan fox? ai adai, saying bad shiit about michael bay. are you kidding me? gurl, don’t talk crap about the man that made you a star. granted michael bay’s movies are equivalent to a middle school education but still.

By: Reel Whore

Reel Whore — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:38:33 +0000

They need to just kill all the people in T:RotF and let the film be about, I don’t know, Transformers! All the robot action scenes were awesome, but can they the rest of the Autobots do more than just drive/run around killing things?

By: Art Voyeur

Art Voyeur — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:10:07 +0000

I accidentally slept in the middle of the movie. Interestingly, the fighting scenes got me snoozing. Too much of one thing can lead to many things.

By: leen

leen — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:26:34 +0000

I was disappointed too. Although the dialogue was a lot funnier in this one, I thought the inuendo was overkill.

And I was a little distracted with my (5-year-old) son constantly asking me to explain some of the scenes–the dogs humping each other, the little snitch bot humping Mikaela’s leg, and the “scrotum” part.

The decepticons were so weak in this one. (I was actually afraid for them.)

The “lost city” of Petra? That was way too cliche for the primes to have hidden the matrix there. I was half-expecting Indiana Jones to pop up and reveal other hidden treasures.

It was fun but longwinded with dialogue. I was hoping they’d feature more autobots or decepticons in close-ups.

The sexual undertones kind of took the childhood memories away.

(Fox was hella hot, but I prefer the subtlety of her character in the first movie.)

By: acey

acey — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:00:03 +0000

yay! it’s finally here! :D

By: trench

trench — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:48:26 +0000

yeah, save a few bucks ray. Its definitely not worth paying full admission for. I’d probably pay for it again however to watch it in an IMAX theater. Since my first experience watching Kung Fu Panda via IMAX, I’ve always wanted to go back! haha

By: trench

trench — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:47:18 +0000

I dont think it will make a difference if I watch it again or not. For action buffs, this film is going to be fun, but for those who need some sort of cohesive story, this movie is trash.

By: ndo

ndo — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:43:36 +0000

I’ll watch it in IMAX and hope that the experience adds to the positives!

By: CRS

CRS — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:39:56 +0000

I think a big part of it is that Bay didn’t want to make a third film. However he could’ve easily streamlined the plot of this one into two more solid movies, leaving Optimus dead or even introducing a new leader like in the old animated film.

Part of me is still hoping the film will grow on me a little more when I watch it again.

By: trench

trench — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:30:42 +0000

I could live with the action sequences. They were top notch and exciting. The story and dialogue were absolute garbage though. The decepticon’s were not menacing at all.

They should have left prime dead, at least for this film. I thought it would have brought more to the table for a third. Killing off THE FALLEN that easily didn’t help either.